"the people" in bold? Somehow by questioning the institution of a feature makes me undemocratic or a "squelcher"? C'mon now...
no. never
said or even
implied that.
I think it's a legitimate question -
i never said it wasn't legitimate.
where did the idea to do it come from and how does it fit with people's sense of anonymity in the forum?
it's hard to say though it's a feature built into the forum software.
Anyone on the creation side want to speak to that?
no me.
It's anonymous and all it does is add pluses or minuses by someone's name - not just their post. How is that supposed to be helpful here? I would rather see the forum encourage people to speak up and sign their names. If you don't like what someone says, say so. And sign your name. That, to me, syncs up with the Honor Code more than anonymous "smites" (could they have picked a more inflamatory word?).
i will gladly hand you the keys and you can see the forum as you like.
And doing something "just because you can" doesn't automatically mean that it's a good idea until it's proven otherwise.
first of all, i didn't do anything "just because i can". secondly, how do you suggest "proving" an idea if it's not allowed to be even tried before people start to call for its removal?
the poll is in favor of removing the karma feature. and when the poll finishes it will be removed (if that's the result).
short of that... i won't be
doing anything more here on these forums just so people can complain about it, short of possibly putting everything back to the way it was before i started to volunteer months of my life to help
the people have a functioning place to communicate.
thanks for your input, Beth. much appreciated.
-erik '97